tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post2149057221438127140..comments2023-10-02T12:02:36.122-04:00Comments on vk.photo.blog: RPP vs ACR vs Capture One 7 (Fuji X-Trans RAF)vkphotohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01379486856099430320noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post-56376477642231321702013-01-21T11:35:57.252-05:002013-01-21T11:35:57.252-05:00Overrated? Not really. Well printed on 13x18cm .. ...Overrated? Not really. Well printed on 13x18cm .. no chance to be visible. But if you will print A3 size at 300 DPi, then on close inspection, it will be visible. If you print A1 size, its visible easily, like watercolor effect.<br /><br />Thing is all these "issues" are matter of how you use your files and how perfect you want to have them at 100% view.<br /><br />Point with 100% perfection is that you can print really large, cause there are no deffects and when there are no deffects there is way less limits. I can use my old 6 mpix camera and some of my pics can be printed what you would consider insanely big, just cause it doesnt have any flaws per-pixel. Thats where is importance of 100% per-pixel perfection. Which I understand isnt important for everyone.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10305933963498137107noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post-78112055324999816012013-01-20T17:17:22.575-05:002013-01-20T17:17:22.575-05:00No offense at all. Zipper effect is real as "...No offense at all. Zipper effect is real as "water colour" or "colour bleeding" effects with ACR. Not everyone is affected. Perception is reality.vkphotohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01379486856099430320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post-20093995262030116492013-01-20T16:55:02.987-05:002013-01-20T16:55:02.987-05:00hi there
no offense but aren't these zipper e...hi there<br /><br />no offense but aren't these zipper effects overrated? I printed several up to 13x18cm and I wasn't able to see them. Of course it depends on what you do with your photos...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post-3966580012003293792013-01-20T11:39:04.560-05:002013-01-20T11:39:04.560-05:00The issue with jaggies seems cured, see my updateThe issue with jaggies seems cured, see my updatevkphotohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01379486856099430320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post-68703020953866877682013-01-19T12:38:26.623-05:002013-01-19T12:38:26.623-05:00Hi Corwin,
I think that zipper effect is related ...Hi Corwin,<br /><br />I think that zipper effect is related to DCRAW engine. If someone can come up with cure then RPP would be almost perfect stand-along raw converter for X-Trans.vkphotohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01379486856099430320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-893483667496421005.post-22868374807918322742013-01-19T11:01:46.278-05:002013-01-19T11:01:46.278-05:00Zipper effect is probably part of X-trans design. ...Zipper effect is probably part of X-trans design. Tho JPEGs seem quite free of it. I guess with different demosaicing algorithm it could be avoided, but it would be probably pretty computational heavy..<br /><br />Photivo works nicely too, I "solved" zipper effect by upscaling image to 200-400% and downsizing back with Genuine Fractals. But obviously can be done with anything, some Lanczos filter is most likely best choice.<br /><br />Tho if Fuji simply used DNG as RAW, nothing like this was needed..Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10305933963498137107noreply@blogger.com